TNAG-2654-FCO40-3847-Extradition-cases-from-the-UK-and-France-to-Hong-Kong-Lorrai-1992 — Page 91

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

letter which was received by the Extradition Unit at

about 5.00 p.m. on the Monday and he had also read Mr.

Osman's first two affirmations sworn in support of his

application. The Home Secretary has indicated that

there was nothing in the letter or the affirmations

that caused him to wish to reconsider his decision to

order the return of Mr. Osman and that the documents

would not in any event have made any difference to his

decision.

Mr. Thomas makes a number of criticisms about the way the

decision was taken and I will examine the principal criticisms

in turn:

1.

The way in which the decision was rushed and the short

period during which Mr. Osman's

Representations

were

actually considered by the Home Secretary. In justifying

his decision, Miss Montgomery points out the delay which

has already occurred and the fact that it was known that

the Home Secretary would have time to deal with the issue

13

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.