TNAG-2650-FCO40-3843-Hong-Kong-visa-policy-1992 — Page 23

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

FM HONG KONG

TO PRIORITY FCO

TELNO 1802

OF 031113Z JULY 92

INFO PRIORITY PEKING, UKREP JLG HONG KONG

12

170613

MDLIAN 6475

17

HK TELNO 1668: CHINA INTERNAL: RETURNING STUDENTS

1. FURTHER TO TUR, AND AFTER SEVERAL FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO PRESS NCNA FOR A REPLY, THE SUPPLIED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.

2. ACCORDING TO NCNA, THE PREVIOUS SITUATION WAS THAT PRC NATIONALS HOLDING SERVICE AND ORDINARY PASSPORTS WHO RETURNED TO CHINA REQUIRED EXIT PERMITS ISSUED BY THE PSB ON EACH OCCASION BEFORE THEY COULD LEAVE CHINA AGAIN. AS FROM 1 MAY THIS YEAR, THOSE HOLDING SERVICE PASSPORTS WOULD NOT REQUIRE THIS PERMIT. NCNA, IN ORDER TO FACILITATE OTHERS WHO HOLD ORDINARY PASSPORTS, HAVE SINCE JUNE BEEN ISSUING THEM WITH LETTERS WHICH WOULD SERVE AS EXIT PERMITS, THUS SAVING THEM THE TROUBLE OF APPROACHING THE PSB BEFORE THEY COULD LEAVE CHINA. NCNA IMPLIED THAT THE PROBLEM OF ENTRY REFUSALS MAY HAVE ARISEN BECAUSE BORDER POSTS MISTAKENLY THOUGHT THAT BECAUSE SOME VISITORS HAD THE NCNA LETTER THAT IT WAS A COMPULSORY REQUIREMENT. IN ANY CASE NCNA THINK THIS PROBLEM SHOULD DISAPPEAR AFTER 1 JULY, AS ALL PRC NATIONALS HOLDING SERVICE AND ORDINARY PASSPORTS WOULD NOT REQUIRE ANY EXIT PERMITS

AFTER THAT DATE.

COMMENT

3. WE MENTIONED IN TUR THE POSSIBILITY OF A BUREAUCRATIC MUDDLE. FROM THE REPLY WE HAVE HAD FROM THE NCNA, IT SEEMS THEY ARE ADMITTING THIS TO BE THE CASE. THERE HAVE IN FACT BEEN NO FURTHER CASES OF REFUSALS SINCE THEN.

WILSON

YYYY

1

PAGE CONFIDENTIAL

нко 345/4

07.1992

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.