TNAG-2490-FCO40-3622-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Basic-Law-1992 — Page 148

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Nigel Cox

HKD

FCO

British Embassy

11 Guang Hua Lu Jian Guo Men Wai

Peking People's Republic of China

Telex 22191 Cable Prodrome Peking Telephone 521961/2/3/4/5

Your reference

Our reference

Date

25 June 1992

HKC 012LL

RECEIVED IN REGISTRY

-9 JUL 199?

DESK OFFIC.

Rev Nofel,

1

INDEX

TO AMEND OR NOT TO AMEND

сн

1. I enclose Mr Zhu's translation of an article in the ''Legal Daily'' on 15 June which sets out very lucidly the Chinese view that it is both inappropriate and impossible to amend the Basic Law before 1997, legally and practically.' You might like to copy it to Ms Barrett, in light of her useful minute of 9 June 1992.

77

w Ricketts fi The Buster 19/7

Ви

This seems

to

Yours

еле

prove that the Chere're have not managed to find any legal or constitutional argument to support the contention that the NPC cannot amend the BL or anered Decisions before their entry into operation in 1997.

ets

J Rogan

cc to recipients of previous minuting CME turs page only) Mis Rogan.

979

KC Mr wye RAD

9/2M Ms Barrett Legal Adm

squi

R+R.

35

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.