TNAG-2450-FCO40-3567-Future-of-Hong-Kong-constitutional-development-1992 — Page 196

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

SECRET **

3.

in

about

The

Governor

said that he felt less strongly

A

about the method of voting for the EC and did not see

the need to go firm on this specific point in his

October address.

He would instead just mention the possible methods and invite public discussion on this

the following months,

The Governor however

considered it was important to mention two points in

his address: firstly, the BL did not give any detail

the EC for 1995 and secondly, our proposal was proposition which would give Legco deeper roots in the

community.

CS said that it should be made clear in

the Governor's address that this would not return to

the old arrangement of DB electoral college whereby DB

members elected their own members to LegCo as

candidature would be open to all registered voters.

SHA said that the proposed EC would encourage more people to stand for election to DBS with the support of political parties.

4.

UK Rep said that it would be unwise for the

Governor to announce a clear decision on the EC in his

address. It would leave no room for manoeuvre for our

consultation with the Chinese who would accuse the

Governor for sabotaging the "through-train".

Governor

The

said that the "through-train" would easily

lead to a condominium in practice if we could not do anything which the Chinese disliked. The point was that whether the "through-train" would actually run

would depend on the operation of LegCo between 1995

and 1997. PA said that the question was how much risk

there was in the Chinese rejecting the entire package

because of the composition of the EC.

consisted of an element of representation based on

FCS, the Chinese would find it more

If the EC

difficult to

G.F. J

SECRET **

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.