TNAG-2425-FCO40-3527-Hong-Kong-Her-Majesty-s-Overseas-Civil-Service-(HMOCS)-poli-1992 — Page 91

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL #

9

would be very

difficult

to

justify setting aside funds on

this scale for the benefit of a small section of society.

Also, in practice the reserve fund should never be used and

it is uneconomical to tie up funds unnecessary.

23.

An alternate

proposal to scale down the pension

reserve fund to cover one year's pension expenditure has been

carefully

considered but cannot be supported.

An estimate of

the costs of a one-year roll forward fund is at Annex D.

24.

Besides the disadvantages mentioned in paragraph

22, a one year reserve could be exhausted quickly and may not

effective buffer in lean years. A one year

serve as an

pension reserve

cannot meet deep seated staff concerns about

The staff unions will instead

the security of pensions.

press for a three or five year roll forward fund which we

cannot afford.

ASSESSMENT

25.

Having

considered the financial and political

constraints, it is recommended that none of the pension

safeguard options should be further pursued at present and

the Chinese should be informed.

G.F. 326

CONFIDENTIAL # 3

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.