TNAG-2404-FCO40-3491-Hong-Kong-defence-and-public-order-1992 — Page 185

SECRET UK EYES A LOCSEN

DCA, which was for discussion between HKG and HMG, and the release of one

barracks, which was dependent on the Defence Lands issue. The barracks

(Burma Lines) was to be handed over to the RHKP for use by their border

force.

29. The Chairman asked about the state of Gurkha morale. CBF stated

that morale was satisfactory, having been helped by the terms of the

redundancy. The staff work had been done and the first tranche of

redundancies had all been interviewed. But it was impossible to tell how

it would develop as the rundown would take place over a long period.

Similarly one could not tell how it would effect the efficiency of the

Garrison.

30. CBF then went on to make some points on the 1991 Review of the

Withdrawal Plan. He explained that he had presented the plan to the

Executive Council. They had made 2 points. First, they wanted to retain flexibility in the withdrawal

withdrawal date of the

date of the second Gurkha battalion.

Second, there was also concern about the number of RAF helicopters being

retained as the HKG were spending a great deal of money on helicopters

for the RHKAAF. CBF had explained to them that these matters would be

addressed in the 1993 Review. However, he made the point to the meeting

that as the Garrison reduced, more, not less helicopter lift would be

required to provide greater mobility. He added that HKG wanted to

conduct their own helicopter review ahead of the 1993 Review but would be

slow to get this underway due to their own problems.

31. CBF HK continued by expressing the hope that we would avoid a

dispute with the HKG over DCA funding. If 'Stronger for Longer' was

accepted it would require additional funding in LTC. He also reminded

the Committee of the requirement to inform the Chinese of the outcome of

the 1991 Review. Mr Stone confirmed that we had a commitment to inform

LOCSEN UK EYES A

SECRET