TNAG-2389-FCO40-3471-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 52

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

1

Date:

Time:

Reporter:

4.12.90

-

2.15 4.30 p.m. MEP/37

Mr Nicholls

have numerous lengthy trials on the same matter. I don't want to

2 hazard a guess at the length of the proceedings that we are

contemplating here, but it is obviously substantial.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

3 +

14

16

The sixth reason which cannot be ignored is that unjusti cost to the public of separate trials should be avoided. Once agai I don't want to hazard the cost. It is not difficult to imagine.

The seventh reason, and an important one in our submissi‹ is that a BMFL trial of Mr Tan on his own would severely prejudice publicity, the subsequent trial of Mr Osman and others, and of

course it involves the same -- the two trials would involve the

same allegation which means the more prejudice and another matter in that context is that in a BMFL trial, Mr Tan might attempt to..

15 blame Mr Osman in his absence. It is difficult to conceive a

greater prejudice than that. I am very much assisted by Mr Grant who has been directly concerned in the proceedings in France, that the solicitors for the Government of Hong Kong in Paris, Simeon Associes, have informed us that Saniman's appeal will be heard on or before 12th February of next year, and we will be given th precise date about the middle of this month. That, Mr Grant tell me, is hot off the press, and the eighth reason in relation to public interest and I may under this heading 'Joint Trial' mentic it is material to bear in minc I may have mentioned already now that Mr Saniman has been ordered to be returned.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

(24

25

26

122123

27

--

Now the second matter of public interest that we rely

is that a trial I will come to the authorities on it progress should not be interrupted. It is a fact that the Westl Barclays trial is in progress. The preliminary argument which y have heard about in relation to a stay was taken before the tria judge. That judge has ordered that it shall proceed.

28

upon

29

30

31

2323

34

35

36

It must:

our submission, be contrary to the public interest to interrupt a criminal trial that is in progress, and in our submission the can be no serious suggestion that both criminal proceedings aga

You cannot have the evidence this accused can run in tandem.

VERBATIM REPORTERS

6573646

HONG KONG

25

8731167

¿

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.