TNAG-2387-FCO40-3469-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 9

EXHIBIT 6.

I say that the FCO cable (EXHIBIT 1), proves that the

Governor of Hong Kong, who brings the prosecution on behalf

of the Crown, knew that the request was corrupt, and warned

The Foreign Secretary accordingly.

I say that the cable shows the extent of Warwick Reids

control and direction of the investigation and prosecution.

I say that Reid knew that the evidence was selective and may

well have known that the Malaysian Government would deal with

the rest of the potential evidence, in the manner evidenced

in the BBMB letter.

I say that the BBMB letter, known to the FCO, and to the HK

authorities, on the face of it, formally destroys any

fairness or balance in the case, and more probably, was to be

expected ever since the corrupt Reid made his biased and

corrupt selection of evidence, as part of an agreement

between HK, Malaysia and UK, in the first place.

I say that the police department letters were legally known

to the Crown, as was both the role and objective of Razaleigh

in the Malaysian prosecution request. At the time the request

was made there was prima facie evidence in the 4 letters,

that it appears that Razaleigh had taken substantial bribes

from George Tan and was implicated, by motive and by the

convicted murderers original confession, in the murder of the

auditor Jalil lbrahim.

I say that the grant of criminal immunity made to the Crown's

principle witness, Jaafar, was made corruptly by Warwick

Reid, in collusion with the Malaysian authorities, who

themselves granted the said Jaafar civil immunity.

Despite Jaffars confession in open court that he had lied to

the Hong Kong authorities and his employers (BBMB) and their

solicitors after the granting of said immunities.The

immunities have not been revoked.

1

кр