EXHIBIT 6.
I say that the FCO cable (EXHIBIT 1), proves that the
Governor of Hong Kong, who brings the prosecution on behalf
of the Crown, knew that the request was corrupt, and warned
The Foreign Secretary accordingly.
I say that the cable shows the extent of Warwick Reids
control and direction of the investigation and prosecution.
I say that Reid knew that the evidence was selective and may
well have known that the Malaysian Government would deal with
the rest of the potential evidence, in the manner evidenced
in the BBMB letter.
I say that the BBMB letter, known to the FCO, and to the HK
authorities, on the face of it, formally destroys any
fairness or balance in the case, and more probably, was to be
expected ever since the corrupt Reid made his biased and
corrupt selection of evidence, as part of an agreement
between HK, Malaysia and UK, in the first place.
I say that the police department letters were legally known
to the Crown, as was both the role and objective of Razaleigh
in the Malaysian prosecution request. At the time the request
was made there was prima facie evidence in the 4 letters,
that it appears that Razaleigh had taken substantial bribes
from George Tan and was implicated, by motive and by the
convicted murderers original confession, in the murder of the
auditor Jalil lbrahim.
I say that the grant of criminal immunity made to the Crown's
principle witness, Jaafar, was made corruptly by Warwick
Reid, in collusion with the Malaysian authorities, who
themselves granted the said Jaafar civil immunity.
Despite Jaffars confession in open court that he had lied to
the Hong Kong authorities and his employers (BBMB) and their
solicitors after the granting of said immunities.The
immunities have not been revoked.
1
кр