TNAG-2383-FCO40-3465-Hong-Kong-nationality-ethnic-minorities-in-Hong-Kong-1991 — Page 4

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

RESTRICTED

BRITISH HIGH COMMISSION

New Delhi 1100-21

Telegrams Ukrep New Delhi Telephone 601371

HKD 340 10

4 SEP 991

3

HKD FCO

Bat-bodie tyy

M

Dew Deputient

HONG KONG INDIANS

SUMMARY

1.

Your reference

Our reference

Date

M

31 July 1991

Me cox malm=

Mr. Morms (on)-(fil

This issue has indeed

quiet for that it

political

been

time. The possibility

now becammy

a domestic

ssue in India will no

doubt

fre up the HK Indian Associations again

However I agree with the recommendatin in the find para that the BAC do not yet yet involved

get involved. If you I shall reply saying

адрее

Indications that the post 1997 status of Hong Kong Indians may return to the domestic political agenda in India, and possibly to our bilateral exchanges with the GOI.

На 7/8

DETAIL

2. Please see Edmond Rose's letter of 5 March to James Rawlinson recording Andrew Burns' discussion with

L L Mehotra (DUS equivalent) of the internal debate here on dual nationality and the possible ramifications for Hong Kong Indians.

3. Leaders of the Hindu revivalist (and largest opposition) party, the BJP, raised the position of Hong Kong Indians with the new Congress (I) Foreign Minister on 25 July. I attach a copy of the proceedings together with subsequent press coverage. The main points made by Solanki are:

(i) a generally accurate description of the status of

Hong Kong Indians as BDTCs or BNOs. (At one point in the supplementaries Solanki's attempt to distinguish between "status" and "citizenship" is hazy but his basic message is both clear and helpful,

/that

RESTRICTED

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.