TNAG-2285-FCO40-3286-Cooperation-between-Hong-Kong-and-China-on-criminal-matters-1991 — Page 26

25

de Showe for achoul at

HKB 380/3

Sipse Mar

on

Mr lox

Mc

Reference

the Ricketts This does not take us much further forward. I suggest that our stone speak to the Home office to check that they wld not wish to get involved in

bad precedent) * HKC cases (which aid anyway be a & we then resubmit explaining the practical problems about case-by-case wetting in London & proposing

Io Bradley's compromise

Criminal

cooperation with clinic

So does Mr Chome

من

чора

того

25/1x

the Suggesten in the

may

Thanks. I agree.

I

|

agree that

second para 2

sensible: best it

Not

meet the

sors withes

see endosure 22.

2

Legal Achises love

view about ou

international obligations

did

say

Not charged Meer

that the obligation, are "unlikely to be breached

ней

:

but

they

"

provided any

assistance was

"strictly limited in

the

way

described by HIC".

1

have

Not

asked why

CODE 18-77

It did not

how the position could change it

strictly limits" the assistance, because

Not strictly

I world probably get an unhelpful reply.

the central Authority, I do not know excectly how it worker but I fear that precedentes are not the problem. The problem is that Hira might well Not

with to cooperate with China in this

way.

be cause

of

the

low esteem in which we

hold their legal l judicial system. We to take this view

de calese we don't sit

can afford

back to

back with Clina ad will have little need for mutical cooperation with them con criminal matter).

2579