25
de Showe for achoul at
HKB 380/3
Sipse Mar
on
Mr lox
Mc
Reference
the Ricketts This does not take us much further forward. I suggest that our stone speak to the Home office to check that they wld not wish to get involved in
bad precedent) * HKC cases (which aid anyway be a & we then resubmit explaining the practical problems about case-by-case wetting in London & proposing
Io Bradley's compromise
Criminal
cooperation with clinic
So does Mr Chome
من
чора
того
25/1x
the Suggesten in the
may
Thanks. I agree.
I
|
agree that
second para 2
sensible: best it
Not
meet the
sors withes
see endosure 22.
2
Legal Achises love
view about ou
international obligations
did
say
Not charged Meer
that the obligation, are "unlikely to be breached
ней
:
but
they
"
provided any
assistance was
"strictly limited in
the
way
described by HIC".
1
have
Not
asked why
CODE 18-77
It did not
how the position could change it
strictly limits" the assistance, because
Not strictly
I world probably get an unhelpful reply.
the central Authority, I do not know excectly how it worker but I fear that precedentes are not the problem. The problem is that Hira might well Not
with to cooperate with China in this
way.
be cause
of
the
low esteem in which we
hold their legal l judicial system. We to take this view
de calese we don't sit
can afford
back to
back with Clina ad will have little need for mutical cooperation with them con criminal matter).
2579