TNAG-2170-FCO40-3107-Hong-Kong-annual-review-for-1989-and-1990-1990 — Page 44

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Separate Copies

Miss Marsden

Mr Haswell

Mr Stone

Ms Major

Mr Morris

FROM: A R Paul

Hong Kong Department

DATE

29 March 1990

неи

21112

RECEIVED IN REGISTR

19 JUL 1990

ISTRY

PA

on Taken

DESK OFFICER INDEX

HONG KONG: ANNUAL REPORT 1989

1. The production of the Annual Report is one of the more painful and tedious exercises which members of Hong Kong Department have to undertake As one who has now been involved in the production of 3 such reports, I have to say that this year's exercise has been by far the most painful and tedious of all.

2.

The original draft was sent to us from Hong Kong at the end of 1989. I had been assured that the draft had been thoroughly checked by all Heads of Section before it was passed to me. Yet it contained a number of major omissions and discrepancies. There was for example no section on the Basic Law and the section on Vietnamese Boat People was very thin indeed and had to be totally rewritten.

3. This necessitated a lot of last minute redrafting, using-up time which the Department could ill afford: as a result I had to work until 3 o'clock in the morning of 22/23 March in order to submit a presentable draft to Mr McLaren by the weekend. He then had to devote a substantial part of his weekend working on the draft.

I

4. Most of this could have been avoided if this exercise had been tackled properly at an earlier stage. This means taking the draft seriously and looking at it carefully to ensure that it is complete and accurate. must look to the Heads of Section to do this. I hope a similar fiasco can be avoided next year when at least some of us will have the dubious honour of preparing the 1990 Report.

ARPan

A R Paul

SAMADN

13

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.