TNAG-1992-FCO40-2839-Capital-punishment-in-Hong-Kong-1989 — Page 13

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

A

MKA 380/1

е

FROM:

P A Penfold

CC:

WIAD

PS/PUS

Mr

HKD

Gillmore

Mr Hendry, Legal Adviser Mr Gorham

DATE: 6 January 1988

ора

N

Mr Fearn

PS/Mr Eggar

PS

BERMUDA:

1.

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

on the

In his minute of 22 December, Mr Wall said that the Secretary of State had asked whether there was any scope for giving advice to the Governor of Bermuda Shorter capital punishment case.

2.

is

I confirm that under existing policy there

no scope for giving formal advice to

advice to the Governor.

In 1986 ministers reviewed in detail our current practice on capital punishment in the Caribbean dependent territories and Bermuda. They concluded that we should stand firm on

the Creech-Jones doctrine ie, that there should be non interference by British Ministers in Capital Punishment cases in dependent territories as the Governor is deemed to know best.

3:

There is an opportunity for informal discussion next week between the Governor and Mr Fearn when they meet at the Governors' Conference in Bridgetown, although when Mr Fearn last discussed the case with the Governor during his pre-posting briefing, Sir Desmond Langley made clear that he would not want any advice from us.

4.

Premier Swan has stated in the past that the people of Bermuda would resent outside interference from Britain. He claims that the attitude of the Government of Bermuda towards Capital Punishment reflects the wishes of the community to retain the death penalty as an ultimate sanction against very serious crime.

5.

The latest position with the present appeal to Judiciary is that the next appeal hearing has been for 26 January when the Troy Shorter case would be

/ expected to

CONFIDENTIAL

cr a

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.