TNAG-1957-FCO40-2786-Hong-Kong-Animals-and-Plants-(Protection-of-Endangered-Speci-1989 — Page 84

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

HKCISI/1

Secretary of State

I fear

that we

пей

mengh

a

FROM: DATE:

c.c.

thick thri out

HONG KONG AND THE IVORY TRADE

2

ра

David Lidington

21 November 1989

PS/Mr Waldegrave PS/Mr Maude PS/PUS

Mr Bayne

Mr Gillmore

Mr Carrick Mr McLaren

Mr Beetham, MAED

Mr Burns, News Mr Edwards, Legal

Advisers

Mr Paul, Hong Kong

Dept

Mr Yeo

319

1. You asked for comments on Mr Paul's submission of 17 November. I have discussed this subject with Mr Fraser and the comments below come from us both.

2.

It would damage this Government's reputation both domestically and internationally were we now to seem to wriggle out of

international commitments which we had taken a lead in establishing.

3. Ministers could expect very severe media criticism if a reservation is entered on behalf of Hong Kong.

4.

Is ivory really a big issue of confidence between Hong Kong and Britain?

5.

What guarantee can there be that the Legislative Council will agree to enact legislation to come into effect automatically after six months? Might we not face in six month's time further protests - from Hong Kong ivory traders and demands for an additional delay?

6. Will not entering a reservation on behalf of Hong Kong put at risk the implementation of the entire Convention by giving ivory traders in other developing countries the chance to cry "foul"?

7.

The lack of a reservation might indeed drive part of the ivory trade underground. But surely this will happen to some extent whenever the Convention is implemented? At least implementation might allow illegally-held stocks to be impounded.

Anna Danby

David Lidington

Rp Special Adviser

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.