TNAG-1812-FCO40-2573-Preservation-of-Ohel-Leah-Synagogue-in-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 39

FOR

Arguments presented

- 2 -

Facts and observations

(f)

(g)

(h)

Freedom of religious communities to modify their places of worship to be respected. Preservation without owners' consent also aberrates from AAB's established practices.

The structural safety of the existing building is in doubt, evidenced by cracks and other signs of general movement within the structure and cladding of the building.

Although not stated in the D-Notice, the slope below the Synagogue above Castle Road is in a critical stage.

Historically, religious customs evolve over time, so do places of worship. Out of respect for religious freedom, the AAB has in the past adopted a "hand-off" policy towards religious bulding in use. In UK, buildings in ecclesiastical use are specially excluded from the scope of scheduled buildings under the Ancient Monuments legislation.

Director of Architectural Services has advised that the cracks are normal of any building of this age, and that the existing building is structurally sound. However, he also advised that the Synagogue may be suffering from dif- ferential settlement of the underlying uncom- pacted fill, or deterioration of the foundations which could be on timber piles.

According to D of Arch. S., while existing retaining wall is considered safe, it could become unstable in the future if ground circum- stances change (for example, if the water level becomes lower) and the Jewish community would then be faced with stabilization costs. Retention of the existing wall therefore renders the Jewish community hostage to future unpredictable circumstances. On the other hand, a new wall which will follow re-development will obviate such risks. It will also provide a long-term solution to the geotechnical problem in this

area.