TNAG-1812-FCO40-2573-Preservation-of-Ohel-Leah-Synagogue-in-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 38

(A)

FOR

Annex

Summary of arguments, presented, facts and observations FOR and AGAINST the lifting of declaration

Facts and observations Arguments presented

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Proposed reconstruction of Synagogue enables provision of enhanced facili- ties in the building to meet with modern day comfort and safety requirements.

Proposed redevelopment also provides improved community facilities for the Jewish population in Hong Kong.

Improved religious and recreational facilities provide opportunity for increasing active membership and is in the interest of the majority of the present and future members of the Jewish community.

Redevelopment is required in order to provide funds for complying with the D-Notice for repairs to retaining walls.

Rights of the Trustees as the legal owners of the site should be protected.

Trustees have proposed to reconstruct the Synagogue to its existing design and dimension, with additional facilities, including fire escapes, air conditioning, and tiered seating to increase capacity.

Under the proposed redevelopment plan, a sub- stantially upgraded recreational club would be provided, together with new provisions

for a nursery, Sunday School, rabbi's accommo- dation and a variety of ancillary and recreational faclities.

a reasonable sentiment and This appears to be is reflected in the support given to the proposal by the Jewish community.

Not entirely correct. It is understood that there are sufficient funds within the Trust to meet the cost for complying with the D-Notice. However, there will not then be much left for other community expenses, including those for maintenance of the Synagogue and Club activities. The question of priority must strictly be the Jewish community's internal affair.

The legal title of the land is vested in the Trustees. In granting approval to the Section

ard 16 application, Town Planning emphasized the need to respect the rights of the legal holders of an unrestricted Crown lease. From past experience, ExCo always insisted on the owner's consent having been obtained before any private building is declared a monument.