great efficiency: but camps and reception facilities are
under extreme pressure. Executive and Legislative
Councillors were unanimous in arguing for a fresh policy.
They were undoubtedly reflecting strong public concern.
3. The Governor and his officials are equally firm in
their view that the new policy has to be introduced.
The most serious of They are fully aware of the risks.
these is that a new policy would not deter further
arrivals and that there would be a build-up of Vietnamese
detainees with no prospect but eventual return to
Vietnam. But this would not be fundamentally different
The
The
in practice from the effect of the present policy.
aim of the new policy would be to achieve maximum
deterrence, while putting in place internationally
acceptable arrangements for genuine refugees.
introduction of the new policy would have to be widely
publicised (including within Vietnam, for example through
BBC broadcasts) and accompanied by renewed pressure on
Vietnam to deter illegal departures and accept back those
who leave.
We
4. I have considered carefully the international legal
and political implications of the proposed policy.
believe it would be defensible in legal terms. It is
nonetheless possible that critics might question its
compatability with our obligations under the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
We
would not have a watertight answer, any more than we have
now over the present policy of closed camps: but our
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.