TNAG-1729-FCO40-2442-Minutes-and-Hansards-of-the-Legislative-Council-of-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 245

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

than the stick.

incentive for the hour prior to 8

In fact, we were proposing a non-peak

am

minutes after 8.451, which could not

loss of revenue for the MTRC.

am

and the 45

be a very huge

17

May I put it to the Secretary that since the date for

implementing the fare increase for the congested period

has now been deferred to 30 May, may I ask the Secretary

to put it to the board of the MTRC to implement the carrot

as well as the stick at the same time and to implement

a price mechanism in a positive manner as an

incentive to try and persuade people to use

the MTR, an hour before

am 8.45

8 am

and 45 minutes after

15 by a reduction in fare at the same time as they

increase the fare during the congested period, which I

think is totally fair and it is something which is well-

affordable as far as the MTRC is concerned. May I request

that the Secretary put this to the board?

SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORT:

Sir, I think the logic escapes me

on this particular proposal. If you were to apply a

reduction outside the peak hours and an increase in the

peak hours, the two would neutralise each other. So where,

in fact, is the impact? I really do not see the point in

doing both at the same time. There should be effect on

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.