1
And if we need time to improve, it is surprising
2
in Ceretit
3
that there is no proposal, as to how we can improve
batton,
50
on that mutual adjustment But by the same token,
A
20
4
Sir, if we need already so much time as six years
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
to enable the indirectly elected Members to adjust-
with the appointed Members, who after all must go
one day
then how much more time do we need to.
bevry allow the directly elected Members, who are treated to be like wild animals by some Members in this this House of this Council so that they could adjust with the appointed Members and the indirectly elected Members ? Surely it is a bad argument.
cap
comp
Cyp
13
how.
14
15.
16
Rɔned17
18
Again, let me remind Honourable
Members of what our Senior Member said on the 15th
July 1987, during the Green Paper debate. houster 'Now, of course, we could say no further change
for 1988. But in the long run, 'no change' is
not an option because the Joint Declaration has
committed us to the greatest change of all; the legislature of the SAR is to be constituted by elections whereas this Council is at present only partly elected.
The longer we postpone further change, the greater
will be the pressure for it and the shorter the 25 time available to see it smoothly introduced.
19
20
21
2225
23
24
26
27
2223
28
I entirely agreed
that.
and I still agree
with
Sir, I have endeavoured, ad nauseam
perhaps, in the view of some Members, to deal with
every reason advanced in the White Paper for not introducing direct elections this year. And I hope
I have demonstrated that none of them is a valid
29
30
31
32
33
34
one.
35
836
Miss Lydia Dunn said yesterday
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.