1
become firmly established.
The Government has therefore
2 decided to introduce a number of directly elected
Members into the Legislative Council sy. # 991,
3
4
5
6
7
be
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
222220
23
24
2.5
26
27
2 2 2 2 2 2 2272 3
28
29
30
31
32
33
Comment:
some treatment, IN
Λ
t fint qohere tav
•
Sir, the last sentence deserves
second last rather there should
sufficient time before 1997 for the new form.
Love
Are ly
i
ཀ
rewith
of election to become firmly established*. But,
surely, that is a reason for introducing them long
before 1997. So, therefore, there is really nothing
In this pumpnale & first til opinions in this paragraph. There were two points, topinic clearly divided, which I dealt with, and then the ‘argument' which is described to be "strong",
which is non argument. But the only possible
interpreting way of looking at this sentence is that the argument is a reference back to paragraph 20, because I tried zo look for it and that was the only other place where I could find the word "argued⭑. And let
-afaiust me repeat this, to paragraph 20:
paragraph 20 : "Those who argued that introduction in 1988 was too soon, either because it could endanger stability and continuity, coming within three years of the last major reforganisation or because the system of elections to be used after
1997 had not yet been established in the Basic Law
have due to be promulgated in 1990.§. But I already
Chan I thoneme vasgest but why dogunat is dealt with that. so that is the only reférence-
Λ back.
л
But let me deal with a possible
bad one.
A
time,
ར
other point these, which is, 'Well, after the introduction
of 24 indirectly elected Members in 1985, that this Council somehow needs time to adjust.'. The question
I would like to ask is 'In what way do we need
34 more time to adjust ?', 'And in what way is it thought
iv
35
that more time could enable us to adjust better ?'.
36.
These are the questions which were never answered.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.