FOR PRU USE ONLY
Co. Restricted.
PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION
For WRITTEN ANSWER on
April 3rd, 1987
RESTRICTER
COVERING CONFIDENTIAL
TEXT OF QUESTION :- SECRET
Head of HKD 89.
HKD(
Please submit :
39
a draft Answer
& Background
3
to Parliamentary Unit
before Noon 2/4/87
Party
C
52 Mr Robert Atkins (South Ribble): To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Com- monwealth Affairs, what representations he has had about the Hong Kong Public Order (Amendment) Bill; and if he will make a statement.
to P/S
MR. RENTONI
(Minister)
30/1
for answer.
RELEVA
HEN
16 APR 1967
(Minister)
INDE
for approval by
ANSWER
Wam April
NOON
PQS
REPLY(S)
REGISTRY
tion Taken
2/4
We have received а number of representations about
this Ordinance. In reply we have made clear that while
this is primarily a matter
matter for the Hong Kong Government
we support the action
taken. they have
legislation passed by a large majority in the Legislative Council of Hong Kong on 11 March included the repeal of a number of stringent provisions of the Control of
Publications Ordinance that had been part of the laws of
The
for need a large Hong Kong for many years, but which have not prevented the
Answer, whicci
X,
explain are of
Ke backgrima
copy to
Private Secretary
PS/
(Minister)
Parliamentary
Clerk
Fine
поли
Thanks
Hong Kong media from being among the most free and out- spoken in Asia. In reviewing this legislation and
deciding upon these repeals, the Hong Kong Government considered that in such a small and densely-populated place as Hong Kong, it was nevertheless necessary to retain
some power to act against anyone publishing false news likely to cause alarm to the public or disturb public order. The provision is not, therefore, a new one, and the result of the legislation passed on 11 March represents a major liberalisation compared with the position before that date.
R.
authorised
CSA
(Head of Dept)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.