1
2
Date:
Time:
18.12.86
9.0 9.50
Reporter:
PMO
MR CHUNG: But not on your behalf?
3
4
MR MOTTRAM: I don't believe so, no, he was working for
the Government under our supervision, for the Architectural Office,
I think.
5
6
7
8
9
for
10
11
12
13
14
MR CHUNG:
Was it a condition in the contract that
once there was a Clerk of Works on the site, then you don't have
MR MOTTRAM:
Oh no.
15
MR CHUNG:
MR MOTTRAM:
to have your own personnel there?
Not at all, no. We would not normally have
supplied constant site supervision anyway. That is precisely what the Clerk of Works is there for, to look after day to day matters, or
hourly matters.
16
17
크
1
21
25
1
273
26
27
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
18
19
20
22
23
24
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
MR CHUNG:
You nromally don't supply that, was this a particular construction that you had to exercise more care?
MR MOTTRAM: We do on every site, on every site. In fact in this particular job, as I recall, the supervision was far more
than we should have done.
MR CHUNG: In other words, you just took this case a normal
case and not a particular case ?
MR MOTTRAM: No, this was just a perfectly normal job.
MR BURDETT: The point my colleague.wants to make is that it is difficult for anybody other than a Clerk of Works to say whether or not the concreting was being done properly or not. It might even be difficult for the Clerk of Works to observe this, how the work is going on and this is certainly not meant to condemn the Clerk of Works at all, we are quite happy with the work he did.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.