Date:
28.11.86.
!
Time:
8.30
12.30
Reporter:
PMO
1
MR CHEUNG:
2
3
4
5
6
This is the Director of Architectural Services,
who said it was aggravated by the superstructure contractor, "who
proved to be lacking in organisation --"
MR CHEONG: And expertise.
7
MR CHEUNG: I think we have dealt with that.
8
9
MR CHEONG:
And expertise.
10
11
12
13
i
14
15
MR CHEUNG: And expertise.
MR CHEONG: And not experience. In your initial submission, Sir, you emphasised that the contractor and everybody was very, very experienced. I am just wishing to point the record straight
ly
16
17
I
18
19
1."
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
33 35
36
CHAIRMAN:
It is not the experience.
MR CHEONG:
it is not the experience that the Director
has mentioned in the report, it is the expertise, and the expertise related to the fact that there was probably, if you go through the
transcripts, it was not enough expertise. Also they have to have a sub-contractor in post-tensioning.
MR CHEUNG: Yes.
That was a specialist sub-contractor.
MR CHEONG:
Yes.
Post-tensioning work was sub-contracted.
MR CHEUNG: Whose qualifications would have been studied before he was nominated as a sub-contractor. Well, Mr Lei said
in answer to you, Mr Chairman, when you ask him on page 2, line 9. [Reads
"Does that reflect on any deficiency in the professional practice ? In the professional expertise or were there any other circumstances leading to such a situation ?" The Director said, "I think basically lack of detailed investigation and detailed study at the time when we let the contract".
187
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.