TNAG-1579-FCO40-2153-Provision-of-judicial-assistance-to-Brunei-by-the-Hong-Kong--1986 — Page 14

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

<<<<

should of course also need to consult Ministers.

ROUTINE

3.

We now await a report of your further discussions

In the meantime we have no objection to your discussing this issue further with the Chief Justice, on this tentative

on

issue particular point me which we would wrtioner your views relates to basis. In doing so you will no doubt wish to keep in mind the provision of Section IV of Annex I to the Agreement, which would

allow the SAR to invite judges from other common law jurisdictions to sit on the SAR's court of final appeal. While we of course appreciate that the current agreement with the Bruneians would need to be replaced by a new one if your present arrangements with them were to continue post-1997, you may feel Would you

consider that it maintenance of that maintenance of an agreement in some form might provide a Bronde an

which might be useful.

h useful element of feciprocity/when we come to consider how the provisions of Section IV Annex I are to be implemented.

(Something like

HOWE

YYYY

MAIN

LIMITED

HKD

SEAD

LEGAL ADVISERS

SIR W HARDING

DR WILSON

NNNN

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.