CONFIDENTIAL
(c) the US may run short this autumn of
refugees in Hong Kong who meet its
resettlement
criteria
at present defined.
own
as they are
three countries, and if even these
It
to
11. If in 1987 we were dependent only on the resettlement
programmes of these
might well be reduced, what would be the consequence for
refugee population levels?
is probably realistic
assume that 1987 arrivals will be at the higher rate seen
so far in 1986 (this rate is almost twice that of 1985, but
about the same as in 1984). On this basis some 2,100
refugees might arrive in Hong Kong next year. Taken
together with a net increase of some 400 resulting from
births and deaths in the camps, 2,500 departures would thus
be required to keep the population in the camps from increasing. At the best the expected reduction in 1987 is
likely to be small. Even this would be
be a disappointment for Hong Kong and a potential source of friction with Hong
Kong opinion. A fall of more than 1,000 (30%) in the
number resettled by the three major countries would result
in the number of refugees in Hong Kong starting to
Any such increase would be received very badly
in Hong Kong.
Critics in the Hong Kong Government
(Officials and Unofficials) and the population at large would lay the blame at our door, arguing that we had failed
to assist the territory to solve its problems.
ill-feeling could of course spill over into other important aspects of UK/Hong Kong relations.
increase.
Such
in the overall
a rise in
in the numbers
in
12. Any increase or even a standstill
in camp population would result closed camps, since all new arrivals are put in them. The actual number in closed camps is currently falling (from 4,863 to 4,553 in January to May 1986) as resettlement from these camps is going well. (Even so the percentage of Hong Kong's refugee population in closed camps is in fact rising
from 48% to 60% of the total in the first 5 months of
as open camp refugees also continue
be to
1986
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.