Some ideas are suggested at Annex F.
31
ANALYSIS, REVIEW, AND ACTION
The next logical step is of course the analysis which
time gap
administrative
should be applied at appropriate intervals throughout
the life of a policy. In the early stages it may not
be possible to say much since there is often a
before results come through. But even if it is only
and procedural possible to look at inputs and at
efficiency, this is worth doing. It may also be useful
to check on how the indicators on effectiveness etc are
being compiled. Among the best administrative disciplines
are regular planned meetings and written
and written reports. Such
reports if discussed with
key individuals can
themselves be part of the
evaluation.
Some departments
the
process of devising
good
find it useful to have
a Steering Group which may include people not directly
concerned with the policy. The appropriate procedure
depends upon the size and the nature of the policy.
of a policy evaluation
32 The outcome / should be a decision either to continue
in the light
as before
or
to
recommend something else
of the emerging information. These are decisions primarily
for the policy manager. Some questions that may arise
in option selection are listed in Annex G.
33 COSTS
Evaluation costs money. The policy
policy manager needs to
is worth devoting
form
a
view on how much effort
evaluation compared with other aspects of the work.
to
Much
13
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.