TNAG-1491-FCO40-2049-Future-of-Hong-Kong-General-Agreement-on-Tariffs-and-Trade-(-1986 — Page 166

nters of the Committee if they would be willing to agree

we could change the order of the day and consider now thei

question of Reservations and afterwards take up this ma

of the Protobol in regard to occupied territories.

CHAIRMAN

I am entirely in the hands of the Commi

to the order in which to take up these various items,

point to which I would like to draw thi

the attention of

think it has cons relation to a que

because I of Rose

Fert

There

#t el

rinor

do th

IIVI

in pa

Geber:

Comm

#16021

11t

L&B be

which have been referred to by, the Delegate of tube We

had circulated this morning the report of the ad hoc sub-

relations between the Protocol of Signature and the Pro of Provisional Application. This report has not yet been the hands of the Committee for 24 hours, but as a decision report of this sub-Committes might wall take the question Reservations, I would like to obte in the sense of the Commi as to whether they would first of all like to deal with the report of this sub-Committee or take up now the paragraph Final Act which refers to Reservatione.

I might say that the Report of the sub-Committee is pontelli in Document E/PC/T/199.

Will the Committee be, in 'egcord' with postponing conalie?.. of the Protool dealing with reletions with Germany, Japan Korea and taking up now the Report of the sub-Committee Protocols?

Is that agspi?

Agreed.

I therefore call upon Mr. Melander, the Chairman aub-Committee.to introduna

skich

♫ster

dil n

bae na

20563

at 001

I

rath

of Bolv

Ziob W

ort

MELANDER (Norway):

The sub-Committee dealing

these two Protocols have come to a unanimous conglusion wh

mounti

in short, &mounts to the deletion completely of the Protooo. Signature and the inclusion of the essential part thereto