1.
2
-
CONFIDENTIAL
confess that the Portuguese were very sloppy about dates. He
had had to explain this to Zhou Nan. The Ambassador also
indicated that there was a problem of Portuguese face over
negotiating throughout in Peking. Also the Chinese were
insisting on describing the negotiations as "talks" (I was not
particularly surprised).
4.
In comment, I was pretty cagey. I explained that I
had not been part of the Sino-British negotiations.
JLG experience, the lessons there were that
Drawing on
a) one prospered by keeping the focus on practical
rather than theoretical matters; and
b)
it was worth taking time to prepare the Chinese
carefully for a new subject. We had made good
use of the time before and between JLGs in
this respect. I said that implementation was
by and large going very well. I had no doubt
of the Chinese wish to make a success of it.
5.
card":
Both the Governor and the Ambassador raised the "Taiwan
recovery of Taiwan was clearly a major Chinese objective
and the British had made skilled use of this. I said they were
probably right about the Chinese sequence of logic but I would
discourage the thought that the British had played this
particular card.
RB P.P.
(J. Boyd)
Political Adviser
30th May 1986
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.