Date
11.10.85 (cont'd)
12.10.85
Statements by Chinese
Officials
BASIC LAW (238)
Newspaper Comments/Editorials Non-Communist
Communist
Statements/Comments
by ot S
different in such areas
as the source of power, they should not interfere with each other. In other words, the BLCC should not discuss pre-1997 legislation and Legco should not debate the Basic Law.
The HK Daily News: It is meaningless and
inappropriate to compare the BLDC with Legco. Even if a comparison is to be made, it can be at most to say that the two are similar in status.
questions. If the majority of members do not feel the need, the Basic Law should not be discussed in Legco.
(report) The HK Productivity Council, which is given a BLCC seat as a designated organisation, has recommended its executive director, Mr S.K. Chan,
to the consultative body.
Statement by Chu Hai College Student Union: Students in the college will not join the BLCC because the panel is only
China's tactic in
creating a false sense of democracy.
Umelco member Allen Lee: The presence of BLDC members in Legco will help ensure that the political reforms and the provisions of the Basic Law will be compatible with each other.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.