TNAG-1395-FCO40-1867-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Parliamentary-debates-1985 — Page 100

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

discussions on Hong Kong's future.

ERIC DEAKINS

(a) International recognition of agreement: Who will be responsible for securing international recognition? Is there

adequate machinery?

(b)

Need for regular reports to Parliament on Hong Kong.

on

(c) Vital that representative Government be in place by 1997. (d) Need to take urgent steps to ensure continued special economic status of Hong Kong in MFA, GATT etc.

KEN EASTHAM

(a) Agreement should be registered at UN.

(b)

British Government should recognise its responsibilities to

Vietnamese refugees.

(c) Annual conferences on Hong Kong involving UK, and arranged through Chinese Government, could be held after 1997.

ANDREW FAULDS

(a)

Nationality: is non-transmissibility of BDTC status open to reconsideration in legislation since covered in Exchange of Memorandum rather than in agreement? UK has duty to prevent

stateslessness.

(b) Full confidence in China honouring agreement.

(c) Will directly elected members of LEGOO in future have privilege

of protection from prosecution? Change oath of loyalty.

(d) White Paper on representative" government unduly pessimistic

about ability of Hong Kong people to comprehend democratic

procedures: quicker pace of change needed.

(e) Unreasonable to expect Hong Kong to bear burden of Vietnamese

refugees on its own.

(f) Need to avoid statelessness.

DENNIS HEALEY

(a) Need to apply lessons of Hong Kong agreement to other areas. (b) Assessment Office: disturbed that one in three people opposed

the agreement.

(c)

Surprised by suggestion that it is impossible to amend the

agreement.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.