Supplementary to question No. 6 in the
Legislative Council on 23 Januray 1985
Mr. CHLUNG Yan-lung asked in Cantonese
自從有關減少校舍外噪音的初步研究於
九
二
年完成之後,統籌委員會為何
需要這麼長的時間進行評估與及分析硏 究結果
(The following is the interpretation of what Mr. CHRUNG asked.)
After the completion of the pilot study on noise abatement measures in schools
in 1931-92,why did the steering committee take such a long time to carry out
the analysis?
vecretary for hducation and Manpower ;- I agree jin this hes taken time.
is quite a complex issue settling on standards particularly for noise as the
environmental experts will vell you; but particularly in this case, what happened
was the initial survey was for the urban area and it was originally thought that
this was adequate to assess the rosivion in the New Territories. This has proved
not to be the case and a further survey had to be done to cover the New
Territories.
閣下
Mr. CHEUNG Yan-lung asked in Cantonese :-
鑒於多年來學童已經忍受着嚴重
的噪音騷擾
政府可否
採取
些臨時措
施
以便改變這種情况?
(The following is the interpretation of what Mr. OHDUNG asked.)
Sir, in view of the fact that students have been disturbed by noise for years,
is it possible for Government to take cut some temporary measures to improve
the situation:
where
Zecretary for Education and Manpower :- Not really I think in addition to what
schools have managed to do for themselves. I am afraid this is an area
stop-gaps really won't do; if this is to be done; it will have to be done properly.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.