TNAG-1325-FCO40-1737-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Parliamentary-debates-1984 — Page 161

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

Parliament. Legislation would be required.

The issue of

sovereignty will be dealt with fully in the proposals that the government hope to put to this House later in the year. The package

of arrangements which we bring to the House then must be judged

and will be decided upon as a whole.

When will draft agreement be published?

12.

Too soon to say precisely. But we are working to a timetable

in the talks which takes account of Chinese wishes and of all our

own requirements. We are aware of the Chinese desire for an

announcement in September. At same time we recognise that any

arrangements negotiated must subsequently be debated by Parliament

taking into account Hong Kong's views.

Nature of Agreement

13. We are seeking a binding and detailed agreement in which a

framework of arrangements providing for the maintenancae of Hong

Kong's systems, laws and way of life will be formally recorded.

Basic Law

14. The question has been raised of whether the essentials of the Basic Law that the Chinese have said they will enacct for Hong Kong after 1997 would be enshrined in the agreement that both sides are

aiming to conclude. Clearly I cannot go into details about the content of the talks or of a likely agreement. But it is clearly very important that the eventual Basic Law should reflect the

content of the agreement, which we hope to see take the form of a

binding agreement setting out the arrangements to be maintained in

Hong Kong for at least 50 years after 1997.

(For use only if pressed on relationship in time between ratification and drafting of Basic Law].

I cannot, as members will understand, go into the details of our

position in these confidential negotiations.

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.