TNAG-1325-FCO40-1737-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Parliamentary-debates-1984 — Page 160

CONFIDENTIAL

successful conclusion of the negotiation.

What if a Draft Agreement was rejected by Hong_Kong?

6.

That is a hypothetical geustion. We are working to achieve an

agreement which will be acceptable to the people of Hong Kong. The continuing consultations that are taking place with the Hong Kong people help us to know what their aspirations are.

Can a draft agreement be amended after publication?

7.

That is the sort of procedural matter on which I cannot

speculate while the confidential negotiations are continuing.

Should ratification be withheld until the Basic Law is published?

8.

Cannot go into details of our negotiating position.

Parallel with Shanghai

9. There is no real parallel. In the case of Hong Kong we are talking of a binding international agreement setting out arrangements for the future. There was no such undertaking in the case of Shanghai: and China has changed over 35 years.

British sell out

10.

Any such suggestions are harmful and untrue. We have been trying and will continue to try throughout the talks to obtain the best possible deal for Hong Kong which will preserve its prosperity and stability. We are unwavering in seeking a settlement acceptable not only to Britain and China but also to Hong Kong.

SOVEREIGNTY [DEFENSIVE)

11.

The charge has been made that sovereignty over Hong Kong has already been conceded to China. This is certainly not the case.

HMG are fully aware that it is not in their power acting alone to conced sovereignty. This could only be done with the consent of

CONFIDENTIAL