TNAG-1288-FCO40-1639-Constitutional-development-in-Hong-Kong-1984 — Page 88

CONFIDENTIAL

L

Referenee...

(363)

(359)

(349

362

Mr.Home

M.Gabmally

Tel to imme Amended

de c4/ai

1934

Tel sent

WHITE PAPER Wal

I no R

по

1. Adept reply to the telmos 3467-9 is below.

2. I have been through the mendments made by bers Kichno 3469) and have meked them in on the text-g

White Paper (Hong Kay (almo 3420). As Home Kayson,

sest cccepted. I have marked

not all our s

suggesting

Foo telo 2223 Shah ones were and which were not.

No reasons have bee grem for not accepting

все-

proposels, but-1% not take any of

are worthin

mean holding

the ones

rejected

fighting for d. this stage (what world

holding up the point:ip of to White Paper).

(359) 3. New pare. 28 ((K) of toho 3469) suggests that the

review may range

over the whole

scope of

items not

coverd in the White Peper. Cilver this, the use

afferent

CODE 18-78

phonses (ep.

the next review",

at a do stage ")

in the White Paper

are

pobably not too sgrficent.

Ralfpens

15/"