CONFIDENTIAL
L
Referenee...
(363)
(359)
(349
362
Mr.Home
M.Gabmally
Tel to imme Amended
de c4/ai
1934
Tel sent
WHITE PAPER Wal
I no R
по
1. Adept reply to the telmos 3467-9 is below.
2. I have been through the mendments made by bers Kichno 3469) and have meked them in on the text-g
White Paper (Hong Kay (almo 3420). As Home Kayson,
sest cccepted. I have marked
not all our s
suggesting
Foo telo 2223 Shah ones were and which were not.
No reasons have bee grem for not accepting
все-
proposels, but-1% not take any of
are worthin
mean holding
the ones
rejected
fighting for d. this stage (what world
holding up the point:ip of to White Paper).
(359) 3. New pare. 28 ((K) of toho 3469) suggests that the
review may range
over the whole
scope of
items not
coverd in the White Peper. Cilver this, the use
afferent
CODE 18-78
phonses (ep.
the next review",
at a do stage ")
in the White Paper
are
pobably not too sgrficent.
Ralfpens
15/"