SECRET
2.
The questions posed:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
would the proposed constitutional arrangements,
not tried in any other colonial territory, satisfy the reasonable needs of the sovereign power?
how in practice could HMG discharge its ultimate
responsibilities for the well-being of the people
of Hong Kong?
would the proposal be compatible with Britain's obligations under a Sino-British agreement to yield up sovereignty in 1997?
Background circumstances:
These proposals are put forward to cater for unusual
circumstances:
(a)
(b)
although constitutional changes have lagged behind Hong Kong's phenomenal development in economic and social terms, Hong Kong has enjoyed de facto autonomy for many years and responsible leaders already share in the processes of Government at various levels, relatively free from factional pressures. Hong Kong also has deeply rooted notions of the rule of law and respect for legality, buttressed by a mature legal system, independent
Courts and able legal practitioners;
to stand a chance of enjoying real autonomy after 1997 it is in the interest of Britain and Hong Kong to promote and promote rapidly the political auth- ority of Hong Kong's communal leaders on represent- ative lines so that Hong Kong can gain experience and confidence in its ability to determine and manage its own affairs;
SECRET
....
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.