TNAG-1281-FCO40-1632-Chinese-visa-office-in-Hong-Kong-1983 — Page 87

Miss Walker HKD

Reference

HKCK 349/1

CONFIDENTIA RECEIVED IN REGISTRY

pa

(im placest (75) photocopy of

fire document

andready infill think).

16 AUG 1983

DESK OFFICER

INDEX

PA

REGISTRY Action Taken

CODE 18-77

CHINESE VISA OFFICE IN HONG KONG: DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.

1. The text of paragraph 2(7) of the draft memorandum, as incorporated in Peking telegram number 791 of 12 August, does not correspond to the text of the draft, as annexed to Mr Clift's submission of 29 July, or to the text as set out in paragraph 1(d) of FCO telegram number 501 of 1 August.

2. Is this simply a mistake, or was there some particular reason why Peking should depart from our text?

15 August 1983

7. Bunows

F Burrows

Legal Counsellor

Ihr Bergous Thank you

видео

مجھ یہاں

This is not a mistake

16/8

Nur Glover

as

FUNTD thought that para 2(7),

drafted in Feo telno 501, night cause confusion, because it referred only to

O

fficers",

their

and thereforedad Care

CONFIDENTIAL appeared specifically to exclude dependents in para 2(3). In your absence, and Mr Whomesley's,

Le Mur Gloves consulted nur Hill, who