Miss Walker HKD
Reference
HKCK 349/1
CONFIDENTIA RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
pa
(im placest (75) photocopy of
fire document
andready infill think).
16 AUG 1983
DESK OFFICER
INDEX
PA
REGISTRY Action Taken
CODE 18-77
CHINESE VISA OFFICE IN HONG KONG: DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
1. The text of paragraph 2(7) of the draft memorandum, as incorporated in Peking telegram number 791 of 12 August, does not correspond to the text of the draft, as annexed to Mr Clift's submission of 29 July, or to the text as set out in paragraph 1(d) of FCO telegram number 501 of 1 August.
2. Is this simply a mistake, or was there some particular reason why Peking should depart from our text?
15 August 1983
7. Bunows
F Burrows
Legal Counsellor
Ihr Bergous Thank you
видео
مجھ یہاں
This is not a mistake
16/8
Nur Glover
as
FUNTD thought that para 2(7),
drafted in Feo telno 501, night cause confusion, because it referred only to
O
fficers",
their
and thereforedad Care
CONFIDENTIAL appeared specifically to exclude dependents in para 2(3). In your absence, and Mr Whomesley's,
Le Mur Gloves consulted nur Hill, who