D)
SECRET
7
―
DSR 11C
Declaration by the Chinese that change would only occur
with adequate warning; this defined as 15 years
(i) Likelihood. Slightly more difficult than (C), as
Chinese would be tying themselves to a specific period.
Becomes harder if selected period stretches beyond 1997.
But Zhou Enlai did say to Sir Alec Douglas-Home in 1972
that Chinese would take no surprise action over Hong Kong.
Might be possible to build on this. Private hints on
length of warning easier for the Chinese than public
statements.
(ii) Problems for HMG. Almost certainly would be
combined with Chinese demand that HMG concede Chinese
Still, better than (C), as it guarantees
sovereignty.
length of tenure.
Powers of continuing administration
Basis
could be tied to Chinese declaration. So could land
leases. Both require Chinese assurances about the
period of warning to be made public in some firms.
for continued British administration would have to be
Chief drawback lies in the fact
negotiated with Chinese.
that the assurance is only effective so long as the
Chinese do not institute a period of warning.
As soon
as that happened we would face weakening confidence in
Hong Kong, although certainly firms and others would have
time to make their plans.
(iii) Effect. Major boost to confidence.
Sufficient
to halt slide of confidence. But only provided it was
quickly followed by UK legislation to bring B ritish
jurisdiction and powers of administration into line with
ǹew concept of validity of 15 years constantly rolled
forward until notice given by CPG. The legal mechanics
. would need to be worked out.
E) Unilateral action by HMG to take powers to issue land
leases beyond 1997; assurance of tacit Chinese approval
(i) Likelihood. Possible, particularly if done in the
form of automatically renewable periodic leases and with
no mention of 1997. Chinese might see it as a necessary
way of preserving investor confidence. Has advantage of
requiring little action on their part.
SECRET
/(ii)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.