TNAG-0923-FCO40-1141-Secondments-from-Diplomatic-Service-and-Home-Civil-Service-t-1980 — Page 79

Nos Mophie fil

sum

HKA 431/393/6

16 APR 1990

Reference

No 101.00.5 BR

Be

R

LAST

Ri F.

Secondment to HK of His officess

10

I confess I am just a little pussled by Mr. Tsang's letter Below. You have underlined the key point,

which is a brief specification. What I am not sure about is whether we are to take it as a request to approach CSD in general terms already, or whether it is for comment and further correspondence with Mr. Tang. If the latter we should are inmediatity for more detailed information. Subject to your views I do not think we have yet the basis of an

approach to CSD.

or Mr. Bang.

2.

Meanwhile Mr. Kean has commented (for both POD and PPD) that these departments are not interested and would be content for us to deal with CSD without further consultation.

M.. Bridgwat $25.4

go

Can't we

para 2 J

Windgurid

ti CSD initially

21.4

the principle

?

leber J 3 Aprel! We could

an

expancin JX.

2 J my

ask Tsany for

2 214

Simultaneously

CODE 18-77

SS 8/78