Nos Mophie fil
sum
HKA 431/393/6
16 APR 1990
Reference
No 101.00.5 BR
Be
R
LAST
Ri F.
Secondment to HK of His officess
10
I confess I am just a little pussled by Mr. Tsang's letter Below. You have underlined the key point,
which is a brief specification. What I am not sure about is whether we are to take it as a request to approach CSD in general terms already, or whether it is for comment and further correspondence with Mr. Tang. If the latter we should are inmediatity for more detailed information. Subject to your views I do not think we have yet the basis of an
approach to CSD.
or Mr. Bang.
2.
Meanwhile Mr. Kean has commented (for both POD and PPD) that these departments are not interested and would be content for us to deal with CSD without further consultation.
M.. Bridgwat $25.4
go
Can't we
para 2 J
Windgurid
ti CSD initially
21.4
the principle
?
leber J 3 Aprel! We could
an
expancin JX.
2 J my
ask Tsany for
2 214
Simultaneously
CODE 18-77
SS 8/78