With regard to the question of job comparability, see no justification when the 1976 Pro report contains company No. 22 (manufacturing), shorthand 50 won typing 40 wpm, which in no way should be co:pazod with the in-scarico SATs shorthand 70 wpm typing 40 vpn, aftor rostructuring 60/50, Wo quote Piu report page 2 para. 12 "It will be noted from Appendix & that the required shorthand/typing spoods for stenogre hic staff and the required truing spood for tyeine staff in the private sector arc Fe or il mer than those required a the Civil Servico
We opine and assure you according to our professional experience, that shorthand 50 wpm is non-functionabio. With regard to your explanation "job contents other than technical skills, we have to draw your attention that the rostructured SAT contains two teams, namely, "pooling" cnd "non-pooling" SATS.
Contradictions from Official Side in previous Consultativo Mootings :
1.
J.
K.
That the PIU was an independent body, and working independently. Scaring in mind and ve stress and opino "not"·
the PIU was restricted not only to the "agreed procedure, normal procedure, correct procedure" but also its survey was bounded and restricted by the 66 companies specified. Based on this round, we opine that the capacity and power of "data Collection" crippled. On the othor hand, the pay investigation unit claimed itself a fact- flading organisation; vitu priary purpose of obtalaing as wide a cross section of ouployoos as possible, a statement which contradicted to PCU prosent practice.
Reforring to the abovementioned, we opno "yes" and the official side confirmed that the removing of any pay level will affect tro median significently no matter lower or higher. We again referred that with the restricted awabor of companies, the 17 companies surveyed as per 1976 PIU report will bo in no way representing a more accurate survey when compared with P.C. report.
It is noticeable that the 68 companios PIU survey adopted for General Secretarial Class are originated from private sectors and in the meantime, the P.C. report is a valuable guidance for majority good employers in 1.K. 177 companies participated)
(1) That in the meeting held on June 29, 1977, Mr. Eroadbridge confirmed 5 timos that the 17 companies of 1976 FIU report were out of the original 24 companies as stipulated in 1973 and 1974 PIU report. In this case, the Official Side failed to clarify the oxisting of Company No. 22 (anufacturing) in 1975 PIU report.
Altd, “battiöifés Being held on 7th July 1977, dr.
LU, in reply to the diocrepancy
as mentioned in (i), first claimed that the Co. No. 22 in question had no analogues in the aroa surveyed, and on the later survey was found to have posts which was comparable with SATS. Boaring in mind that at this stage,
/K. (ii).......
(LL)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.