TNAG-0812-FCO40-1017-Allegations-of-bribery-and-corruption-in-Hong-Kong-1978 — Page 8

(8) Goronwy's letter

Redacted under FOI exemption 40(2)

knowingly, maliciously and unlawfully tells a lie that Hong Kong Government have carried out a thorough investigation of Mr. Tung's allegations". This is an absolute lie. Hong Kong Government have never, never --ied to investigate. We have four important witnesses in this

case:

and

myself. Hongkong Government have never, never, asked me OF any witnesses among the other three any question in regard to this case.

(9) Goronwy's letter willfully, knowingly, maliciously and unlawfully

tells a lie that Hong Kong Government "have been unable to

find any record of the case he refers to". an complaining about the criminal behaviour and conduct of the co

am not complaining about any mecom

have identified

as the suspect who demanded me of money at his home and abused his power of the open court to bargain bribes with the witness

at the

open court with my affidavit or sworn statement of the true facts. The correct procedure of Hong Kong Government should be use my affidavit to cross-examine

the broker

to

and myself, But Hong Kong Government did nothing. Lord Goronwy is saying something against his own conscience and against his own sense of fair play. We have 4 important witnesses and my affidavit is the record. How could Lord Goronwy insist that the corrupt Magistrate should make a record of his CWT. corruption as the basis of evidence? He uses ridiculous reasons to cover up the criminal activities of this corrupt 23: (10)Goronwy's letter willfully, knowingly, maliciously and unlawfully

invented and manufactured an "illegal law" of his own, on his own ingenuity to deceive a non-lawyer layman victim, like me, by say -ing that the corrupt

must make a record of his own corrupt activities in court, in order to enable such a victim to make complaint to a high-ranking officer to make an investigation for the purpose of rehabilitation. According to Goronwy's invention of'illegal law of his own in- genuity, a high ranking British Government official can ignore the eye witnesses including the victim himself and can also im- ore the sworn testimony in the form of affidavit and sworn ståt- ement in writing unless the criminal can make a record of his own criminal activities against himself.

For instance, if the wife of a Minister of State reported to the police that she could identify the rapist who had raped her in a lonely place with a sworn cestimony paper, could the police head refuse to investigate by saying to her: "I cannot investigate is unless you can produce a criminal record made by the rapist him- self about his own raping activities.?"

If a victin customer reported to the manager of the bank that he could identify the bank employee who received his deposit money for his own use without entering into his account, could the tank manager say to the victim customer: I cannot investigate your complaint because there is no record in the bank to prove your basis of complaint."? A criminal magistrate like any criminal. If the victim of a robbery reported to the police that he could identify the robber who had robbed hin of his money, could the police head refuse to investigate it by saying: cannot inve- stigate because the robber did not make any record of his own. criminal activities.

a criminal magistrate make record of

his own criminal activities in open court against himself? (11) Goronwy's letter willfully, knowingly, maliciously and unlawfully fabricated a term "wrongful conviction" pretending as if it were a case of "human error" through due process of law to deceive Christpher Price M.P. and others to smear my reputation for cover-up. The whole letter distorted my sworn testimony paper beyond recognition, looking as if a letter written by a paid lawyer acting on behalf of

i reserve my right ba

necessary.

facts in explanation if