TNAG-0683-FCO40-832-Political-aspects-of-administration-of-justice-in-Hong-Kong-1977 — Page 299

464

:

A.

285.

308

зад

1.0. I did not mention.

It was a substantial bribe according to you given to a senior officer?

Yes.

According to you you told us about 1st senior officer you bribed

before 1st Defendant?

Yes.

And 3rd one was 2nd Defendant then?

In fact first person I bribed was 2nd accused.

.

A.

*-.

A.

First person you bribed was the 2nd accused?

Correct.

And that makes 1st Defendant the second one?

Yes.

Since then you had lir. X?

Yes.

Is he the 3rd?

Tec.

They are the only 5%

Correct.

When you were making these 3 tapes you told ICAC about ...r. A?

Correct.

And yet although according to you D2 was the first one you paid money

to?

Jorrect.

By first one I mean the 1st senior officer including anyone above

you senior in rank?

Yes,

In 3 hours of tapes you did not think it important enough to mention?

Ies.

And the only explanation you can give for that you did not think it sufficiently important?

A.

Tot ar important as the other matters.

For 3 hours you mean to say you were able to talk about matters more important than that?

A.

Ies.

You mean amount paid to 2nd Defendant was not important that you

did not tell ICMC?

It is not that. I did not want to tell ICA but 4 nould tell them

in future.