TNAG-0683-FCO40-832-Political-aspects-of-administration-of-justice-in-Hong-Kong-1977 — Page 298

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

307

A.

462

ชื่อ

.10

463

284.

A.

A.

ja,

*-

Matters.

lou did not consider that an important thing?

dot as important as matters I recorded on tape.

I suppose each of the tapes took up many minutes?

Tes.

All full of important things?

You cen put it that way.

And you have been given copies of the tapes?

I did not take them.

Your solicitors have them?

No.

Who took the first tape?

ir. whiteley.

How long did it take for first one?

B. About an hour.

ho took the 2nd one?

Also . Whiteley.

low long did it take for 2nd taper

A.

About an hour.

?

What was interval between 1st and 2nd same day?

>>

Ch.

3

A.

A.

The recordings were taken one week after the other.

And how long did the 3rd tape taken?

About an hour.

Also taken by Mr. whiteley?

Yes.

You had 3 hours to tape important things?

Correct.

You never mentioned your corrupt activities from 1963-1970%

Correct.

You never even mentioned payment you made to 2nd Defendant and

conversation with him?

Correct.

Of course I put it to you in fact no such conversation took place?

A. It did happen.

No such payment ever took place?

A.

It did.

یات

Zet if you say it did happen you put things on tape for 3 hours yet

you think it was not important to mention?

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.