TNAG-0679-FCO40-828-Allegations-of-corruption-and-bribery-in-Hong-Kong-1978 — Page 121

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

FORM NO. 1

Case No. S

Pol. No.

7016

881178

(ss. 8 and 71)

HONG KONG

*

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT AT

Summons to the defendant upon information

#mling

IN THE CASE IN WHICH THE Queen by---

染達に

~I Tatawo, IL.P.

and

..........lä, kuan ko kova, karowel.....

To the said defendant

INFORMATION having been laid before the undersigned,

a magistrate of the said Colony, for that you on theth....... day of ...læ.cembar

at

19 76,

...i keung. à hui. Crous. Fond renn... ki. Zau bing Arven in this Colony,

when you were the driver of taxi bearing

registration mark i. 2675 did refure without reasonable excuse to drive the taxi to a place

indicated by hirer.

Informant

Defendant rritories,

あみ

FJ Z ‡ J Z X A H Y

Z

Contrary to Heruletions. 22(a) & 44 of the Road

Traffic (-axis, Fublle Gmnibuses, fublic Light Buses

NOTE

The hearing date of this summons

has been adjourned to 3-AUG-1977 at 10 a.m.

Regulations,

=

一九七七年八月

31 AUG 1977

一九七七年八月卅日

9/11 2013

上午十時五

These are, therefore, to command you, in Her Majesty's name

to be and appear

on

the

at

10 A.M. o'clock in the

day of - 6 JUL 1977

19

noon, at the said court, before such magistrate as

19

may then be there, to answer to the said informet go, and to be further dealt with according to law.

The 22 JUN 1977.

617

MAGIS

day of

Du

Magistrate

pt of information for Summons

2 3 MAY 1977

19

section (5) of section 18 of the Magistrates Ordinance (Chapter 227 of the Revised Edition of the Laws magistrate may in his discretion accept a plea of guilty contained in a letter addressed to him and may thereupon impose such penalty as the law provides for the offence to which the defendant has pleaded guilty but shall not impose any fine exceeding five hundred dollars or any term of imprisonment. If the defendant decides to take this course he may if he chooses mention in such letter any facts which he thinks mitigate the offence. The magistrate has a complete discretion as to whether the defendant should be required to attend and plcad personally and if the statement of facts (if any) in mitigation is disputed by the prosecution at the hearing of the summons this may lead to the personal appearance of the defendant being required.

F BA

of Hongch

POL. 34A (REV.)

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.