о
!
3 -
· 12.
Even if one were to accept that there was any
validity in an argument linking cutbacks in textiles to trade
balances, there would be no logic in applying this argument to
Hong Kong and the other 'principal suppliers' unless it was
also applied to, for instance, the United States, Japan and
Iran, each of which runs trade surplus with the EEC much larger
than Hong Kong's, and to Malaysia, which runs a surplus larger
than Korea's and Taiwan's though some what smaller than
Hong Kong's.
$
Predicament with regard to a new KFA
13.
The first point to make here is that there is not
going to be a new MFA. There is going to be a renewal of the
existing MFA or no MFA at all. It is difficult for Hong Kong
to see that countries which have a higher GNP per head than Hong Kong or which are less dependent on textile exports is in any greater predicament than Hong Kong.
14.
Hong Kong has built up and maintained its exports
of textile products despite a steadily widening range of
restrictions on those exports while many other countries have
had no restrictions on their exports to the EEC. They have
heen able to compete more freely than Hong long and in some
sectors they have done so very successfully.
15.
The fact that Hong Kong has been able to maintain
its position as a principal supplier is due to its ability to
supply what the market requires in those sectors where we are
still competitive.
16.
Why should Hong Kong be penalised for its success?
Hong Kong believes that this question should be considered in
the light of these considerations:
(a) Hong Kong is a practically resourceless territory;
(b) Hong Kong is almost uniquely dependent on exports
of manufactures;
/(c).
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.