TNAG-0560-FCO40-655-Review-of-narcotics-problem-in-Hong-Kong-1975 — Page 56

1.

?.

This shld be looked at much more

lovely and the vicus

of the Embassy in Paris sought before any

views are

decision is

absolutely essential.),

taken. (The Embassy's

My reaction is one of considerable scepticism. Embassies abroad represent HM.G.'s views and offairs & a foreign Gervenamail They surely do not exist to "poride convenient attachment's for people who are not formally vember of the Embacay, I accept the Banghoh andagy, but it would surely only be a fair one of the

if the Hong Kong police

police official

were

similarly to be accretional to the Paris Embaczy

possibialy but

is a

coepe

of pollens

3.

I also do not

see

Penty

laises

ce

different sel

This

fence. These sort of arrangements are trying & rush this

f

are complex and take some

to be done paperly.

I arrange of they care

are &

Pão crouted wit Рад

have

лава

my objection to this isba,

provided that it must with the approval of the Combassy

Depart

Departments concured Igra

that it is essential that the proposal

in Paris and the other Fee

Embe

bukanny fruit.

is gut

gut beke

h

married

beiling for af grade

any

The Rent Allowance

Police boppen lendent equates) in

ведрем

equates) in Paris is

th (approx £320 at unment

rate of

6 l to which

FRS

3,500

рел

Mon

exchange. The

Ambassader

has

discretion

by

20%

should it

move

necessary.

Ahlbächen

crease

this

A. S.D

Note: I spoke to Mr Wright (WED), who confirmed that Lo 19/3

had

objection to long

was did nothing contrary to Paris's wither.

BD 2013