Institutes, some of which have not even now been built.
Hong Kong have been dilatory in supplying us with
this information
and on ge
om
moving details of the
books and equipment required, and I admit that we
might have pressed them harder for this information
given the lapse of time since the announcements
were made.
4 I am drawing these projects to your attention since
سمان ساگر
we have a submission ready to go before the Projects
A
Committee on the Hong Kong Polytechnic and hope to have
our submission on the technical institutes ready
within the course of the next few weeks.
5 Mrs Hart is aware of these projects from a submission
by Mr Stuart in November last year.
Flag B
However, given
that the Ministerial announcements on these two
projects were made by an earlier Government and that
they in no way conform with her policy on aid criteria
I wo ld be geful for advice as to whether we
details of
should submit these projects to Mrs Hart prior
to our going to Projects Committee,
recommended
nota
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
Zi chur
thony koy
he wrongly
and horjel
sword
Rendorse his
Whisk the
should
jv
dat.
Dev relatairs with Keng Keng are still at least as
Hang
difficult
now as
they were in
whe
1971/72 good lule
contuure to need the maximum of good will in
the laldry on both the vent when
sued matters
(шайте шё але
من
At
worden sharing the lefurce costs
стрывался
seeking a much bigger contribution from Hany Kang) and the Mars Transit failway (whine Butule manufacturers will be congety for contract) are
Uus is no mie
time to
go
back and undertakings adnanly gum and
autstandin
therefore very m Th endorse Mr stunts
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.